2 July 2023
Ebb and Flow
This image from the other night came from a difficult sky made up of varying layers of assorted clouds. A cold front had rumbled through from the South bringing a winter chill to the afternoon and I was initially disheartened at having to face such a sky. But in the end though I worked through my fear and like what came out of it.
The sky was like a dog’s breakfast, as they say here in Australia. When I had arrived in the late afternoon, I found a thick stripe of lemon yellow squeezed in between two layers of purple clouds like a sandwich that quickly went to hell in a hand basket. But for a time, it was a wild ride and by the end I left the chilly beach in a good mood.
Like most sun-kissed afternoons on a tropical beach, both the sea and the sky can have a cool and friendly look of Prussian Blue, but at sunset it begins to make the switch towards the warmth of sunset and leans towards a Violet palette.
This can play around with a painter’s head because when I use too much Prussian Blue in the sea, I'll look up and suddenly realise that the sea is begging for more Ultramarine. Depending upon the sky it can dither like this for a while, back and forth, until the sky finally takes charge leaving the sea to meekly follow suit. OK, I think to myself, now the sea is Ultramarine Blue, until it’s not, because everything keeps changing all the time.
Unless one is a painter or an observant beachcomber, all this can be really confusing to explain, but honestly, it’s the most delicious part of Painting in front of nature. This banter in my head is a visual one, but it’s engaging like in a feisty courtship between young lovers; it’s “GO AWAY!” but then “COME BACK!” and this continual back and forth can make Painting so tormenting.
But, as always in this Painting game, a capricious picture like this puts even more technical demands upon me if I have to quickly throw one wet colour over another because I must first ‘marry’ them on the palette like I’m some sort of high priest or something. It's this marrying of colours on the palette that will later ensure a harmonious marriage on the canvas.
Only at the end of a session does a picture need to have a climax when it must be wrapped up in a hurry. At least that’s how I felt with this picture the other evening. Of course, I'm often asked (by civilians): “Why don’t you just paint from a photograph, or from memory?” “Why put yourself through all this emotional turmoil? Why all the melodrama?"
In life, I'm generally not a drama queen, but at the beach in the middle of a troublesome sky, I can get a little excited and it's a good thing too because my civilian life is pretty ho-hum these days. But painting from life or a photograph is for me, a no-brainer. It’s the difference between seeing a photo of the person whom you desire and dancing with her/him.
Anyway, I couldn't paint a picture like this from memory, either in a studio, or anywhere else. I’ve never worked from photographs though I know lots of people who do. It’s a vastly different approach to painting. With it's fluid rules and spontaneous touch, painting from nature is for me the most fun. But, hey! This large art tent is a true democracy where everyone can do it their own way. For me though, with it's fluid rules and spontaneous touch, painting from nature, or one's own memory, is the only way to go.
When I told a friend that I was writing this book, they asked me if I would ever consider using AI. I was baffled at the question and it seemed like an equally astounding thing to ask a painter who is writing about their own work. I’m an amateur writer, but one with a lot to recount, and all of it so personal that it seems unfathomable to imagine a computer, or even a ghost writer for that matter, to stand in for me in this adventure. I mean, don’t writers write to find out what they are feeling and thinking? Ditto, for a painter? But to be fair, some do exercise these crafts expressly just to make money but isn't what I’m trying to do. I'm only after self-discovery because I don't answer to anyone else. Any anyway, if there is no ‘human voice’ how can there be authenticity? It's the one necessary ingredient because if one fakes the human voice there is no art.
Understandably, if one were calculating a scientific or medical experiment, then sure, why not use AI. I have seen examples of AI writing superb school papers that fool everyone, but what is the motive if it’s to cheat your way through your education?
A long time ago back in New York, I was telling a friend about a woman I was seeing and about some issues we were having when he stopped me and suddenly asked: “What’s your motive in this relationship? What is it you're after? Is it friendship? Companionship? Sex? Are you looking for a wife?" he said. I was dumbfounded by the question because no one had ever asked me such a thing in my whole life. Of course, I realised a little later that it might have been any one of these things, or even all of them at once because I always bite off more than I can chew. This happened at a time when great changes were roiling my life so I took it to heart, and now, years later, I figure out my motive in any situation I'm facing.
So, I've learned a lot since then and now my motives are clearer, especially in both this painting project and in the book I'm writing. In both, I'm only interested in how I learn more about what I’m seeing and what I’m thinking, so therefore, AI would never be an option for me. But none of all this did I tell my friend weeks ago when he broached the question. I couldn’t articulate this because in fact, I hadn’t yet written it all down to understand it, and what I haven't yet written down, I rarely trust.
So, anyway, something as personal as painting or writing poetry doesn’t have a ‘hit counter’ that scores points like in the music business. And though it may seem something completely outside our current zeitgeist, I'd rather be authentic than rich and famous, but that's my choice, and although I need money, I think I'm too shy for fame.
Anyway, whether or not AI will evolve well enough to supplant poetic spontaneity in the future will still not concern me because except for spell check and google searches, I don’t use it, nor will I in the future. Although down the road, when my heart goes wonky, I'd be grateful for a Dr Robot.
Finally, because it always begins and ends with Turner for me, one only has to look at what he did in his small watercolour sketches to imagine the endless possibilities that are still available for any kind of painter today. I cannot imagine this could ever be reproduced by a computer because this interaction can only arise from a spontaneous combustion between a painter and a motif out in Nature. It’s the ebb and flow between two living organisms, humankind and mother nature.